<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The &#8216;Tagging&#8217; Rule facing the Chicago Blackhawks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mynhltraderumors.com/2009/11/19/the-tagging-rule-facing-the-chicago-blackhawks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mynhltraderumors.com/2009/11/19/the-tagging-rule-facing-the-chicago-blackhawks/</link>
	<description>Your source for NHL News and Rumors</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.mynhltraderumors.com/2009/11/19/the-tagging-rule-facing-the-chicago-blackhawks/comment-page-1/#comment-645</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mynhltraderumors.com/?p=1315#comment-645</guid>
		<description>I was thinking the same thing Rick. Also

"From Article 50.5(e)(iv)(C):
For a Club that wishes to sign an Unrestricted Free Agent "

These players are Restricted Free Agents, do the same rules apply?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking the same thing Rick. Also</p>
<p>&#8220;From Article 50.5(e)(iv)(C):<br />
For a Club that wishes to sign an Unrestricted Free Agent &#8221;</p>
<p>These players are Restricted Free Agents, do the same rules apply?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.mynhltraderumors.com/2009/11/19/the-tagging-rule-facing-the-chicago-blackhawks/comment-page-1/#comment-644</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mynhltraderumors.com/?p=1315#comment-644</guid>
		<description>I don't classify myself as an 'expert' so I'm allowed a mulligan every once in awhile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t classify myself as an &#8216;expert&#8217; so I&#8217;m allowed a mulligan every once in awhile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.mynhltraderumors.com/2009/11/19/the-tagging-rule-facing-the-chicago-blackhawks/comment-page-1/#comment-642</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mynhltraderumors.com/?p=1315#comment-642</guid>
		<description>Am I reading the "Tagging" Rule properly as posted by ChiTownHustle?  If the Hawks sign these guys prior to December 1, then as it reads the rule does not apply.  Perhaps they will/can get this done prior to December 1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I reading the &#8220;Tagging&#8221; Rule properly as posted by ChiTownHustle?  If the Hawks sign these guys prior to December 1, then as it reads the rule does not apply.  Perhaps they will/can get this done prior to December 1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChiTownHustle</title>
		<link>http://www.mynhltraderumors.com/2009/11/19/the-tagging-rule-facing-the-chicago-blackhawks/comment-page-1/#comment-640</link>
		<dc:creator>ChiTownHustle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mynhltraderumors.com/?p=1315#comment-640</guid>
		<description>So you have a blog promoted as "your source for NHL news and trade rumours", yet you have never heard of the tagging rule? If your going to be a "source" you need to brush up. Man anyone can get a blog these days.

read section 2 and beyond...
       From Article 50.5(e)(iv)(C):
    For a Club that wishes to sign an Unrestricted Free Agent following the commencement of a season (i.e., after the first day of the NHL Regular Season), if the Club signs such a Player to an SPC after December 1, then the following rules shall apply:
    (1) In order for the Club to sign such a Player to a one-year SPC after December 1 of a season, the Club must have Payroll Room equal to or in excess of the remaining Player Salary and Bonuses to be earned by the Player under the SPC in that League Year; and
    (2) In order for a Club to sign such a Player to a multi-year SPC after December 1 of a season, the Club must have Payroll Room equal to or in excess of the Averaged Amount of the Player Salary and Bonuses for the remainder of such season.  If, however, the Averaged Amount of the SPC exceeds the Club's Payroll Room for the then-current League Year, the Club may still sign such SPC, provided that it has Payroll Room and, if such Payroll Room is insufficient to acquire the SPC, it has an amount equal to one or more SPCs that will expire at the end of such League Year, in an amount equal to or in excess of the amount by which the Averaged Amount exceeds the Club's Payroll Room (the "Tagged Payroll Room").  Until such time as the Club has or makes Payroll Room in the current year in excess of such Tagged Payroll Room, the Club may not engage in any Player transactions requiring Payroll Room, including but not limited to, acquiring an SPC or "extending" or entering into a new SPC (the "Tagging Rule").  In the event the Club does have or creates such excess Payroll Room, it may use such excess Payroll Room in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you have a blog promoted as &#8220;your source for NHL news and trade rumours&#8221;, yet you have never heard of the tagging rule? If your going to be a &#8220;source&#8221; you need to brush up. Man anyone can get a blog these days.</p>
<p>read section 2 and beyond&#8230;<br />
       From Article 50.5(e)(iv)(C):<br />
    For a Club that wishes to sign an Unrestricted Free Agent following the commencement of a season (i.e., after the first day of the NHL Regular Season), if the Club signs such a Player to an SPC after December 1, then the following rules shall apply:<br />
    (1) In order for the Club to sign such a Player to a one-year SPC after December 1 of a season, the Club must have Payroll Room equal to or in excess of the remaining Player Salary and Bonuses to be earned by the Player under the SPC in that League Year; and<br />
    (2) In order for a Club to sign such a Player to a multi-year SPC after December 1 of a season, the Club must have Payroll Room equal to or in excess of the Averaged Amount of the Player Salary and Bonuses for the remainder of such season.  If, however, the Averaged Amount of the SPC exceeds the Club&#8217;s Payroll Room for the then-current League Year, the Club may still sign such SPC, provided that it has Payroll Room and, if such Payroll Room is insufficient to acquire the SPC, it has an amount equal to one or more SPCs that will expire at the end of such League Year, in an amount equal to or in excess of the amount by which the Averaged Amount exceeds the Club&#8217;s Payroll Room (the &#8220;Tagged Payroll Room&#8221;).  Until such time as the Club has or makes Payroll Room in the current year in excess of such Tagged Payroll Room, the Club may not engage in any Player transactions requiring Payroll Room, including but not limited to, acquiring an SPC or &#8220;extending&#8221; or entering into a new SPC (the &#8220;Tagging Rule&#8221;).  In the event the Club does have or creates such excess Payroll Room, it may use such excess Payroll Room in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.mynhltraderumors.com/2009/11/19/the-tagging-rule-facing-the-chicago-blackhawks/comment-page-1/#comment-639</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mynhltraderumors.com/?p=1315#comment-639</guid>
		<description>Cap number of $43.732 for 14 players. Toews, Kane, and Keith will get over $13 million combined, which would put the team over this years cap number. All 3 will be close to $17 million cap number</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cap number of $43.732 for 14 players. Toews, Kane, and Keith will get over $13 million combined, which would put the team over this years cap number. All 3 will be close to $17 million cap number</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.mynhltraderumors.com/2009/11/19/the-tagging-rule-facing-the-chicago-blackhawks/comment-page-1/#comment-638</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mynhltraderumors.com/?p=1315#comment-638</guid>
		<description>I knew about this, and have no doubt that the Bowman's are aware. They can hold off signing these deals as long as they like -- I imagine they are actually trying to move Huet and his terrible $5.65m annual salary. Are you 100% sure they will be over the cap? Is someone reporting the annual amounts for these players?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew about this, and have no doubt that the Bowman&#8217;s are aware. They can hold off signing these deals as long as they like &#8212; I imagine they are actually trying to move Huet and his terrible $5.65m annual salary. Are you 100% sure they will be over the cap? Is someone reporting the annual amounts for these players?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
