Rick Nash has been traded to the New York Rangers


It’s official: Rick Nash, Steve Delisle and a conditional 2013 3rd round pick (pick goes back to the Blue Jackets if the Rangers make the Stanley Cup final) for Brandon Dubinsky, Tim Erixon, Artem Anisimov and 2013 1st round pick.

3:40 PM:

  • Bob McKenzie via twitter: Deal official. If the Rangers make it finals, the conditional 3rd round pick goes back to the Blue Jackets.

3:38 PM:

3:31 PM:

  • Darren Millard via twitter: “In fact the $7 mill in nash isn’t as bad when sather dumps the $4 that went with dubinsky.  Pressure on nash to raise his #’s.”
  • Greg Brady via twitter: “Nash overpaid? Yes. Overrated? Yes. Sather going to be disappointed? Yes. Does CBJ look Mickey Mouse getting only this after 5 months? YES.”
  • Dan Tencer via twitter: “As one-sided as the trade is (and it really is), I think much of the criticism of Howson is unfair. He had an impossible circumstance here. “

3:21 PM:

  • Bob McKenzie via twitter: The minor leaguer going to Rangers is likely because the Blue Jackets would have been over the 50 contract limit.

3:19 PM:

  • Joe Haggerty via twitter: “Rangers kept all of their untouchables out of the Nash deal. Bruins didnt want to disrupt their team or take on that albatross of a contract “
  • Corey Pronman via twitter: “Erixon is the kind of player the advanced stats guy will like. Will take a ton of defensive zone starts and play versus top forwards. “
  • Kevin Weeks via twitter: “Tough trade 2 execute but #CBJ took long time & I believe that compressed the market (teams) & value in return compensation.”
  • Mike Hume via twitter: “Lopsided trade potential aside, if Erixon blossoms CBJ could emerge from the summer with a solid top-pair for future in Erixon-Ryan Murray.”

3:10 PM:

  • Todd Cordell via twitter: “Nash wanted out and CBJ had to trade him. Every GM knew that and wouldn’t give top assets. Why are people surprised at this deal? “
  • James Gordon via twitter: “You know, for all the Howson-bashing going on, the market decided Nash’s price. Still feel he is way, way overrated.”
  • Dan Rosen via twitter: “The return Columbus got for Nash if the reported trade goes down seems fair, but they all have to pan out for it to really work for CBJ.”
  • James Cybulski via twitter: “How does it take Carolina and Pitt 24 hours to make a fair Staal deal, and yet the Nash trade takes 5 months to agree on that package? “
  • Bruce Garrioch via twitter: “The Jackets needed to a hit a home run with this deal. This is not a home run. They had better offers at the trade deadline.”

2:58 PM:

  • Tom Gulitti via twitter: “Howson was in a tough spot, but it looks like he caved just to trade Nash rather than hold out for value.”
  • Rick Springhetti via twitter: “One thing though, if Erixon accepts the trade, CLB will have an excellent group of young D-men with Erixon, Murray, Moore and Savard. “

2:47 PM:

2:42 PM:

2:35 PM:

2:31 PM:

2:23 PM:

  • Darren Dreger via twitter: Multiple players involved, contracts are being reviewed, etc. All to be done before a trade call.

Rick Nash

Brandon Dubinsky

Tim Erixon

Artem Anisimov

, , , , ,

  1. #1 by Jose at July 23rd, 2012

    Rangers have Nash and Flyers have Weber. Get off your ass Shero! At least this means that Rangers or Flyers won’t be getting Doan. I guess that is a positive. Maybe bring in Ryan for the Pens? We just need to get better

  2. #2 by hotwings at July 23rd, 2012

    seems like a reasonable deal.. basically 2 3rd line centres and what will end up being a total of 2 late round 1sts (erixon,+ future pick)… kind of anti-climatic to be honest… the rangers did well to keep their most prized prospects… howson got depth and 4 decent pieces back for one… not a bad deal on the surface…

  3. #3 by Brent at July 23rd, 2012

    HAHAHAHAHHA brutal! Rick Nash for a bag of chips!

  4. #4 by tdeuce at July 23rd, 2012

    Nice deal Sather! Kept all his untouchable players and still got this deal done. I don’t think this is an awful deal for CLB, but I’m not sure Howson handled this all that great. Seems like they could’ve got more or should have looked to get some prospects instead of Dubinsky.

  5. #5 by Mikey at July 23rd, 2012

    Penguins could trade Paul Martin and Tyler Kennedy or Brandon Sutter for Bobby Ryan.

  6. #6 by Jose at July 23rd, 2012

    To Mickey

    It would take a lot more than that. And we aren’t trading Martin, it is that simple. He will have a bounce back year, and everyone will forget about his problems. A more probable deal is:

    Bortuzzo, Kennedy, Tangradi, and a 1st for Ryan

    We just got Sutter. We aren’t going to trade him. This deal is actually pretty similar to the Nash deal. They get 2 young forwards, a prospect D and a 1st. Thoughts?

  7. #7 by hotwings at July 23rd, 2012

    i think these orgs that let some of their star players turn sour on them are out to lunch.. who knows what goes on behind closed doors, but to force your own hand and scapegoat a player is a hallmark of bad leadership at the mangement level…

    some of these guys whose orgs have soured on them, and in turn, have soured on their orgs, are in their prime. its not like they are trading a 35 yr old to help restock the shelves… insanity imho…

  8. #8 by BLAH at July 23rd, 2012

    Wow Howson spent like six months waiting to get this deal done really?Now columbus doesn’t have a single player who should be on the first line. No disrespect to Howson but I’m sure he could’ve gotten a much better deal from SJ.

  9. #9 by D at July 23rd, 2012

    looks like a lot of people are bashing this deal, but i think its alright. the team that gets the best player usually wins, fair enough, but i think clb got some decent pieces. still a work in progress, but if they’re going to rebuild their team, then they’ve acquired some assets that can definitely add some value to what they have.

  10. #10 by BLAH at July 23rd, 2012

    Usually id agree with u (#9) and it is true that they did get some pieces but those pieces were pieces they already had anisimov and Dubinsky r 2nd or 3rd liners like Foligno umberger Brassard etc. They need pieces for their first line to become a winning team I don’t think its a terrible trade but they could have got ton better from SJ with rumoured names like Pavelski who personally i believe is better then Anisimov and Dubinsky

  11. #11 by LordStanley34386110 at July 23rd, 2012

    I’m really liking this off.season.Although we made one minor edition only,Suter Rick Nash and soon Shea Weber will all be out of my Hawks division and Lidstrom retired also .Beat the Blues and were in the playoffs easily

  12. #12 by Shark at July 23rd, 2012

    @#1 rangers still have 10mil in cap space an they are still looking to get Doan. Pens need to get Semin or they could fall to 3rd in the Atlantic

  13. #13 by BLAH at July 23rd, 2012

    Any ideas on East Standings? With all these big moves I’m curious to c way u think

  14. #14 by Bipten26 at July 23rd, 2012

    To Jose

    The only way Martin is going to bounce back this year is if the Pens start playing like the Devils and he plays with Letang the whole year. Martin just does not fit the Pens style.
    I do agree with u about your trade pieces. But, Shero doesn’t really need to make a move. Byslma needs to get the team to play team defense. The rest of the NHL has figured out the Pens Style. until that changes, 1st round exit every year.

  15. #15 by JETS4LIFE at July 24th, 2012

    Good deal for both clubs rangers get Nash and Blue Jackets get some good players. Anisomov is out of New York and will score probably 30 goals this year playing top line with Dubinsky putting up all star numbers and Erixon will be traded as well as the 1rst round pick witch will be the 30th in the draft

(will not be published)

  1. No trackbacks yet.